Hugh Barbour, The Quakers in Puritan England, Yale publications in religion 7 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1964), xi. Barbour is speaking, presumably (?), mainly of those composed "During 1652-65, the years with which this book is most concerned," and therefore not, for example, of Fox's Journal, since "Fox's well-known writings have been less used here than works by other Quaker authors." Madeleine Pennington: "The Journal is not strictly a contemporary source; even the earliest manuscript was only written during Fox’s imprisonment in Worcester Jail between 1673 and 1674, as he dictated it to his stepson-in-law Thomas Lower, and the first published edition was not issued until 1694. Furthermore, since the original manuscript is missing its earliest pages, the passages dealing with Fox’s early religious formation only appear in the 1694 edition onwards" (Quakers, Christ, and the Enlightenment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021), 6).
Saturday, July 17, 2021
"they despayrd not of ye gift of tongues," or An incommunicated "Omnisciency and Omnipotency"
![]() |
| Juan de Flandes, 1500/04 |
Hugh Barbour, The Quakers in Puritan England, Yale publications in religion 7 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1964), 151 (original italics re-introduced), citing first p. 575 of the 1679 Testimony of truth exalted of Samuel Fisher, and second "Charles Perrott to Joseph Wilkinson, Paris, January 17, 1656/57" (Extracts from state papers relating to Friends, ed. Penney (1913), 24, which is even more abbreviated than Barbour indicates).
Friday, July 16, 2021
"No such item as a virtuous people."
Thomas McNulty in Sebastian Barry's Days without end: a novel (New York: Viking, 2016), 226.
Thursday, July 15, 2021
Se non è vero, è molto ben trovato
"One is almost tempted to speak of the scene [(Auftritt)] of the discoverer of America before the Talavera Commission [reproduced, for example, on the Columbus doors of the U.S. Capitol] as a mythologue [(Mythologem)]. Like most myths [(Mythen)], the [one] compressed into this scene [(Szene)] of the demonstration of the spherical shape of the earth does [but] one [thing]: it explains the present—and as it became, so it is. Enabled thereby is a positioning of modern man in time (important at none other than a time of global spatial expansion [(Entgrenzung)]), and the dissociation [of him] from [(Abgrenzung gegenüber)] an Other experienced as foreign, primitive, threatening, etc. In 'reality' the world of the Middle Ages may [?!] have been less flat than many moderns believe. But [summoning up] the will to correct the error [(Den Irrtum korrigieren zu wollen)] has turned out to be [a] rather hopeless undertaking: Se non è vero, è ben trovato. If not true, it is nevertheless well invented. As one puts it with felicity today, it makes simply too much sense."
Thomas Reinhardt, "Die Erfindung der flachen Erde: der Mythos Kolumbus und die Konstruktion der Epochenschwelle zwischen Mittelalter und Neuzeit," Paideuma: Mitteilungen zur Kulturkunde 53 (2007): 175-176 (161-180).
Saturday, July 10, 2021
Flammarion engraving
| Flammarion, L'atmosphère (1888), 163 |
"Experts [however now] agree that the engraving was original to the book by Flammarion. Although some [of its] stylistic features appear to echo [those of] the late 15th or early 16th century, a more precise iconographical examination quickly reveals that the motif [(Motiv)] cannot have been engraved before the late 19th century, and therefore depicts not the medieval worldview, but rather the idea [(Bild)] of th[e medieval] worldview constructed for itself by modernity. And yet it was again and again described as [a] woodcut 'from approximately 1530' and enlisted in illustration of the European conception of the world before Columbus. This makes it obvious on the one hand how much the idea of a 'disc-shaped Middle Ages' satisfied popular demand for simple explanations of the world, but shows above all the power with which such faulty conceptions, once anchored in the public consciousness, are carried forward."
Thomas Reinhardt, "Die Erfindung der flachen Erde: Der Mythos Kolumbus und die Konstruktion der Epochenschwelle zwischen Mittelalter und Neuzeit," Paideuma: Mitteilungen zur Kulturkunde 53 (2007): 163-165 (161-180).
Note well that Reinhardt, writing in 2007, does not cite
- Stefano Gattei, writing in 2014: "An original fake: closing the debate on Flammarion's engraving," in Fakes!? hoaxes, counterfeits and deception in early modern science, ed. Marco Baretta and Maria Conforti (Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications/USA, a division of Watson Publishing International LLC, 2014), 226-265, which I was put onto by Segner himself via private correspondence, who wasn't thereby endorsing its conclusions prematurely.
- Hans Gerhard Senger, writing in 2011: "Der »Wanderer am Weltenrand«: eine alter oder altertumelnder Weltaufriss?," in Atlas der Weltbilder, ed. Christoph Markschies, Ingeborg Reichle, Jochen Brüning, and Peter Deuflhard for the Berlin-Brandenbergische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: Akademie Verlag GmbH, 2011), 342-352, which I was put onto by Segner himself via private correspondence.
- Hans Gerhard Senger, writing in 2001: "Denken in neuen Horizonten: Der Holzschnitt des Flammarion - Wanderer am Weltenrand," in Horzonte: Nikolaus on Kues in seiner Welt: eine Ausstellung zur 600. Wiederkehr seines Geburtstages (Trier: 2001), 16-19, which I was put onto by 2011, above.
- Hans Gerhard Senger, writing in 1998: "'Wanderer am Weltenrand' — ein Raumforscher um 1530? Überlegungen zu einer peregrinatio inventiva," in Raum und Raumvorstellungen im Mittelalter, ed. Jan A. Aertsen and Andreas Speer, Miscellanea Mediaevalia: Veröffentlichungen des Thomas-Instituts der Universität zu Köln 25 (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1998), 793-827, whom I am reading right now, and who argues, against Weber (1973, below) and the consensus, that "there are, after [1973 just] as [there were] before, good grounds for a dating in the 16th century" (794) after all. (Note, too, that Senger includes an "Ergänzung und Fortzetzung des Literaturnachweis von Bruno Weber (1973)" of 28 items dating from 1946 to 1997 (pp. 819-820).)
Although Reindhart is right that what
the image depicts is a flat, disc-shaped earth, this does not seem to have been
either what Flammarion, in 1888, invented it to stress ("je me suis élevé en
ballon plus haut que l’olympe grec, sans être jamais parvenu à toucher cette
tente"), or what most of those who were duped by him used it for either.
And yet, though Flammarion himself did
not, there were several in the long line of those deceived who drew special attention to its flat-earth
implications, if only in passing: Georges
Urbain and Marcel Boll in 1933 (Weber Anhang no. 14 (Bruno Weber, "Ubi caelum terrae se coniungit: ein altertümlicher Aufriß des Weltgebäudes
von Camille Flammarion," Gutenberg Jahrbuch 48 (1973): 398-407 (381-408)): "la Terre flotterait, comme un bouchon, sur
les eaux planes et horizontales"), Lucien Rudaux and Gérard de Vaucouleurs in
1948 (Weber Anhang no. 16: "Le ciel
forme au-dessus de la Terre plane une voûte hémisphérique"), Herbert Meschkowski
in 1961 (Weber Anhang no. 30, Das Christentum im Jahrhundert der
Naturwissenchaften: "der Erdscheibe"),
Aniela Jaffé in 1967 (Weber Anhang no. 50-52: "am Rand einer altertümlichkosmischen Landschaft"), Friedrich Becker in
1968 (Weber Anhang no. 56: "die
scheibenförmige Erde"), John Desmond Bernal in 1969 (Weber Anhang no. 59: "In medieval times there was a return to the
concept of [a] flat Earth"), and Oto Bihalij-Merin in 1971 (Weber Anhang no. 70: "Der Mensch an den Grenzen der Welt").
Whether Flammarion intended to
deceive (intended it to be taken for an authentic early modern woodcut) is
another question.
Sunday, July 4, 2021
Diversi(on-ici)-ty, diversi-ionism
James F. Keating, "Woke religion," a review of American awakening: identity politics and other afflictions of our time, by Joshua Mitchell, First things no. 312 (April 2021): 51 (50-52). Cf. Havel.




