"To give greater force to his demonstration’s argument from divertissement, Pascal crosses two themes: [1] that of the divertissement that pushes ennui [temporarily] into the background, and [2] that of the obstinate search for an object or state the acquisition of which will not give happiness. . . .
". . . No one escapes [the necessity of the former]. Such is the condition of every man [including Pascal himself]: if he is not diverted, he is unhappy.
"This necessity constitutes a paradox: divertissement is what diverts us from the necessary, and yet . . . is [itself] necessary."
Michel Le Guern, "Pascal et le divertissement," Théophilyon 14, no. 2 (November 2009): 276, 280-281 (267–283).