Sterne on "attitudes" surely as much emotional as physical

"When my uncle Toby first mentioned the grenadier, my father, I said, fell down with his nose flat to the quilt, and as suddenly as if my uncle Toby had shot him; but it was not added that every other limb and member of my father instantly relapsed with his nose into the same precise attitude in which he lay first described; so that when Corporal Trim left the room, and my father found himself disposed to rise [again] off the bed—he had all the little preparatory movements to run over again, before he could do it. Attitudes are nothing, madam—'tis the transition from one attitude to another—like the preparation and resolution of the discord into harmony, which is all in all.
     "For which reason my father played the same jig over again with his toe upon the floor—pushed the chamber-pot still a little further within the valance—gave a hem—raised himself up upon his elbow—and was just beginning to address himself to my uncle Toby—when. . . ."

     Laurence Sterne, The life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gent., IV.6 (GBWW, 1st ed., 1952, vol. 36, p. 342). Applied as much to the rise out of an emotional as out of a physical state (as much to the extrication of oneself from a funk, just for example), I find this to be both true to experience and extraordinarily perceptive.

Walter Shandy on catastrophe

"fire, water, women, wind".

     Laurence Sterne, The life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gent., IV.16 (GBWW, 1st ed., 1952, vol. 36, p. 350).

Sterne on Aquinas and "the gulf of school-divinity"

"This at once started a new dispute, which they [(the two theological faculties of Strasburg, the Lutheran and the Popish)] pursued a great way, upon the extent and limitation of the moral and natural attributes of God—That controversy led them naturally into Thomas Aquinas, and Thomas Aquinas to the devil.

"The stranger's nose was no more heard of in the dispute—it just served them as a frigate to launch them into the gulf of school-divinity—and then they all sailed before the wind.

"Heat is in proportion to the want of true knowledge.

"The controversy about the attributes, etc., instead of cooling, on the contrary had inflamed the Strasburger's imaginations to a most inordinate degree—The less they understood of the matter, the greater was their wonder about it—they were left in all the distresses of desire unsatisfied—saw their doctors, the Parchmentarians, the Brassarians, the Turpentarians, on one side—the Popish doctors on the other, like Pantagruel and his companions in quest of the oracle of the bottle, all embarked out of sight.

"—The poor Strasburgers left upon the beach!"

     Laurence Sterne, The life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gent., IV.Tale (GBWW, 1st ed., 1952, vol. 36, p. 334). How funny is that? Sterne can get away with just about anything in my book, even a dig at Thomas Aquinas as ridiculous as this one. (I wonder, though, if he doesn't have the positions of the two theological faculties reversed.)

Garrigues on the inalienable prerogatives of the Jews

"Paul continues to say, in the bosom of the apostolic Church that gathers together into the one Body of Christ both Jews and Gentiles (cf. 1 Cor 12:13, Rom 9:24): 'we [Jews]' (Eph 1:11) and 'you [pagans]' (Eph 1:13, 2:11; Rom 11:13)."

Jean-Miguel Garrigues, "Les prérogatives inaliénables du peuple juif selon saint Thomas commentant saint Paul à propos de La promesse par le Cardinal J.-M. Lustiger," Revue thomiste 103, no. 1 (2003): 147.

Aquinas on the inalienable prerogatives of the Jews

"the Jews have a privilege in the contemplation of divine things: 'In Judah God is known, his name is great in Israel" (Ps 75:1 [RSV]) . . . . They have also a privilege in their prayers, in the promises and in their descent: 'They are Israelites, and to them belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ. God who is over all be blessed for ever. Amen' (Rom 9:4-5 [RSV]). And in each of these prerogatives, their superiority is not slight, but great and principal."

Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, cap. 3, lect. 1, no. 249 (trans. Stroubant de Saint-Éloy, p. 158), as quoted by Jean-Miguel Garrigues, "Les prérogatives inaliénables du peuple juif selon saint Thomas commentant saint Paul à propos de La promesse par le Cardinal J.-M. Lustiger," Revue thomiste 103, no. 1 (2003): 149, italics mine. If this article is indeed fully representative, then Aquinas' theology of Judaism was quite simply astounding. And yet Garrigues' larger and more striking point is that this position was by the time of Aquinas largely traditional. The problem wasn't the doctrine but that the doctrine hadn't yet passed "into acts of justice and charity" (157). For that there was only the apostolic age, and then the period after the Holocaust (Vatican II and the pontificate of John Paul II) (145).

Aquinas on what is natural

"we call that natural which is produced by an agent to which the patient is naturally subject, even if what is produced is not conformed to the nature of the patient. . . ."

Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, cap. 11, lect. 3, no. 910 (trans. Stroubant de Saint-Éloy, p. 404), as quoted by Jean-Miguel Garrigues, "Les prérogatives inaliénables du peuple juif selon saint Thomas commentant saint Paul à propos de La promesse par le Cardinal J.-M. Lustiger," Revue thomiste 103, no. 1 (2003): 156.