Matthew "means by the verb [(Terminus)] 'sins' [in 18:15]
not every little misadventure, every mistake, not the venial sins that can
creep up on the man and [the] Christian; rather, 'sins' designates those cases
in which a Christian [1] seeks the life of another [Christian] or [2] misleads
him into an apostasy from the faith. In
this most wicked of cases, the fellow Christian cannot and may not look on in
indifference, but must help and protect.
To put it concretely, when Judas goes about his wicked work, Peter is
not permitted to remain idle. The
protection of the [1] life and [2] faith of the third [party] is the necessary
and sufficient reason for church leadership [(Kirchenleitung)] and church
discipline. Where the perpetrator can be
converted off of [(von . . . abbringen)] his wicked path, that is good. But where not, the community must then tell him
what he has himself done [(bewirkt)]. He
has, by his own behavior. excluded himself from the community. The phrase 'as a Gentile and a tax collector' denotes precisely the impossible possibility of being deprived, as a Christian—from
even the [merely] human point of view [an] incalculable [loss]—, of the
[Christian] community and salvation [itself]. . . .
". . . the keyword ἁμαρτάνω in v. 15 is closely linked with another
word that occurs in [v. 6]: σκανδαλίζω: to sin within the community means to endanger
a brother or sister in [2] faith and/or [1] life. Here there can and may be none of that
neutrality that Matthew otherwise so clearly enjoins on his community. Church discipline becomes necessary when (and
only when) a [member] of [(in)] the community stands in need of th[is] protection-and-help-for-the-third-[party].
"The procedure that Matthew here prescribes for his
community carries the procedure for bilateral conflicts known from the 'Testament
of Gad' [(Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs)] and Qumran into the
three-way relationship. This means that
the situation addressed by the New Testament text is not covered by the cases
just cited [(TestGad 6, 1Q 5:24 ff., CD 9:2 ff)]. The relative mildness of the early Jewish
texts cannot be opposed to the sharpness and unmercifulness of Matthew. On the contrary: the procedure laid down by Matthew is of a breadth
and circumspection that stands in striking opposition to even the later penitential
prescriptions of the Church, as Origen, for example, so obviously gives us to
understand in his interpretation of th[is very] passage.
"That the three-stage process of admonition is meant to effect
the conversion of the one confronted requires no further proof. [But] If the worst case of public
obliviousness of guilt [(Schuldvergessenheit)] obtains [(if, that is, the
sinner, having been 't[old] his fault', 'refuses to listen even to the church')],
then the community—obviously the local community—can at that point only bear
witness to what the sinner [has] already effected [(praktiziert)]: Community is by him already so obviously
renounced that it can no longer be healed by [any] human power."
Christoph Kähler, "Kirchenleitung und Kirchenzucht nach Matthäus 18," in Christus bezeugen: Festschrift für Wolfgang Trilling zum 65.
Geburtstag, ed. Karl Kertelge, Traugott Holtz, and Claus-Peter März, Erfurter
theologische Studien 59 (Leipzig: St.
Benno-Verlag GMBH, 1989), 140, 144 (136-145).
No comments:
Post a Comment