"a god who had sacrificed himself to men"

"'One can only imagine the astonishment of the hundreds and thousands of Indians who asked for baptism as they came to realize that they were being asked to adore a god who sacrificed himself for men instead of asking men to sacrifice themselves to gods, as the Aztec religion demanded.'"

     Carlos Fuentes, as quoted by Robert Royal in

• 2014 January 11 (no citation)
• 2006:  The God that did not fail (New York:  Encounter Books, 2006), 158 and 288n13, citing "The buried mirror:  reflections on Spain and the New World ([Boston and] New York:  Mariner, [Houghton Mifflin Company,] 1999)" (no page number).  There I have have found only this so far, on p. 146 (pp. 156-157 in the Spanish edition of 1992).  It's comparable, but note that it comes up (in this book) readily in a Google search, while the Royal wording (above) returns only publications by Royal:

In a universe accustomed to seeing men sacrificed to the gods, nothing amazed the Indians more than the sight of a god who had sacrificed himself to men.  It was the redemption of humankind by Christ that fascinated and really defeated the Indians of the New World.  The true return of the gods was the arrival of Christ.  Christ was the recovered memory that in the beginning it was the gods who sacrificed themselves for the benefit of humankind.  This misty memory, engulfed by the somber human sacrifices ordained by Aztec power, was now rescued by the Christian church.  The result was flagrant syncretism, the blending of Christian and aboriginal faiths, one of the cultural foundations of the Spanish American world.

• 2001 (no citation)
• 1999 May (no citation)

     In actual fact, it comes from near the end of the second episode of the documentary The buried mirror:  reflections on Spain and the New World (the episode entitled The conflict of the gods), where it follows some comments on the adoption of the Blessed Virgin as mother (cf. "The conquered people now had a mother.  They also found a father" (p. 146)), and is worded somewhat differently:

This new world wanted a father.  It did not find him in the figure of the conquistador, but in that of Christ.  One can only imagine the astonishment of the hundreds and thousands of Indians who asked for baptism as they came to realize that they were now to adore a god who sacrificed himself for men instead of asking men to sacrifice themselves to the gods, as the Aztec religion had demanded.  It is surely no accident that on this statue it is the heart, the ultimate gift of sacrifice, that is so prominently displayed.

In the book this is anticipated by the opening pages of chapter five ("The rise and fall of the Indian world"):  "Because the gods had sacrificed themselves so that the world and humanity might exist, humanity was obligated to plunge, if needed, into the great, permanent bonfire of life and death", such that "The need for sacrifice was an undoubted thing in Indian society, not subject to discussion or skepticism of any sort" (p. 94).  Whether it is anticipated in quite this way in the documentary, I have not yet determined.

"The strangely conservative French"

"the French have never gotten over killing God during the Enlightenment, and cope with it in one of two ways:  by ritually reenacting the murder through radical atheism, or by searching for something to fill the now empty tabernacle."

     Mark Lilla, "The strangely conservative  French," The New York review of books 62, no. 16 (October 22, 2015):  51 (50-52).

Faith, hope, and charity, but not without patience

     "Dear brethren, we must endure and persevere if we are to attain the truth and freedom we have been allowed to hope for; faith and hope are the very meaning of our being Christians, but if faith and hope are to bear their fruit, patience is necessary."

And "charity can be steadfast and persevering because it has learned how to endure all things."

     St. Cyprian, On the value of patience 13 and 15, as translated in Liturgy of the hours 1, pp. 192-193 (Office of readings, Saturday, First week of Advent).  Cf. Thornton, LF 3 (139), pp. 257 and 259 (250-265); Wallis, ANL 5, 484-491/ANF 5, 484-491; Conway, FC 36 (1958), pp. 275 and 278 (263-287); etc.  Wallis:

"We must endure and persevere, beloved brethren, in order that, being admitted to the hope of truth and liberty, we may attain to the truth and liberty itself; for that very fact that we are Christians is the substance of faith and hope. But that hope and faith may attain to their result, there is need of patience."

"it [(charity)] can tenaciously persevere, because it knows how to endure all things."

Conway:

"We must endure and persevere, beloved brethren, so that, having been admitted to the hope of truth and liberty, we can finally attain that same truth and liberty, because the very fact that we are Christians is a source of faith and hope.  However, in order that hope and faith may reach their fruition, there is need of patience."

"charity can persevere steadfastly because it has learned how to endure all things."

"tolerandum est et perseuerandum, fratres dilectissimi, ut ad spem ueritatis et libertatis admissi ad ueritatem et libertatem ipsam peruenire possimus, quia hoc ipsum quod christiani sumus fidei et spei res est.  ut autem peruenire spes et fides ad fructum possint sui patientia opus est."

"ostendit inde illam [(caritas)] perseuerare tenaciter posse, quod nouerit omnia sustinere."

     St. Cyprian, De bono patientiae 13 and 15 (CSEL 3.1, pp. 406 and 408).

Passive euthanasia

Euthanasiecentrum Hadamar

"Stargardt describes how one German doctor in 1939 tipped off the families of mentally handicapped patients in his sanatorium that their loved ones were destined for extermination, and urged their removal.  Few took advantage of his warning.  Are we sure, absolutely sure, that in the same circumstances American or British people would have displayed greater compassion?"

     Max Hastings, "How the Germans closed ranks around Hitler," a review of The German war:  a nation under arms, 1939-1945, by Nicholas Stargardt (New York:  Basic Books, 2015), among other titles.  The New York review of books 62, no. 16 (October 22, 2015):  30 (28-31).

Why we name our children

"These two words, 'Faith,' and 'Elijah,' they point to all my husband had to say to this world: 'Put your faith in the Lord.'"

     Rachel Swasey, at a memorial service for her husband Garrett Swasey in Colorado Springs, 4 December 2015.  Rachel got only one thing wrong:  Elijah means not just "The Lord is God," but rather "The Lord is my God."

"absolute pacifism is unsustainable"

Wikimedia Commons

"We give thanks at this hour that that indeed happened, and it is not only the countries that were occupied by the German troops and delivered from Nazi terror that give thanks.  We Germans, too, give thanks that liberty and law were restored to us through that military operation.  If ever in history there was a just war, this was it:  the Allied intervention ultimately benefited also those against whose country the war was waged.  Such an observation, it seems to me, is important, because it demonstrates on the basis of a historical event that absolute pacifism is unsustainable.  This, of course, in no way diminishes the duty to ask very carefully whether and under what conditions something like a 'just war' is still possible today:  that is to say, a military intervention conducted in the interests of peace and according to moral criteria against unjust regimes."

     Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, "A conference given by Cardinal Ratzinger at the Church of Saint-Étienne in Caen, June 5, 2004" ("conférence intitulée «À la recherche de la paix», donnée à Saint Etienne de Caen, le 5 juin 2004"), in Europe today and tomorrow;  addressing the fundamental issues, 2nd ed., trans. Michael J. Miller (San Francisco:  Ignatius Press, 2007), 86 (85-100).  Communio:  revue catholique internationale 29, no. 4 =no. 174 (juillet-août 2004): 108 (107-118). I was put onto this by Timothy George, "After dinner, a beheading," First things, 30 November 2015:

The fact that the Normandy landings "also served the good of those against whose country war was waged. . . . shows, based on a historical event, the unsustainable character of an absolute pacifism."

"Une telle constatation me paraît importante, car elle montre, sur la base d'un événement historique, le caractère insoutenable d'un pacifisme absolu." 

p. 91 (111-112 in Communio):

"in defending the law against a force [(force)] that aims to destroy law, one can and in certain circumstances must make use of proportionate force [(force)] in order to protect it.  An absolute pacifism that denies the law any and all coercive [(coercitif)] measures would be a capitulation to injustice, would sanction its seizure of power, and would abandon the world to the dictates of violence [(violence)]. . . .  But in order to prevent the force of law itself from becoming injustice, it must be subjected to strict criteria that should be acknowledged as such by all.  It must inquire into the causes of terrorism, which very often is rooted in injustices that are not countered by effective measures.  Therefore it must strive by all means to remove the preexisting injustices.  Above all, it is important to offer forgiveness again and again in order to break the vicious circle of violence [(violence)]. . . .  In all these cases it is important that there not be just one political power that maintains law and order.  Particular interests then become too easily mixed up in the intervention and obscure the clear vision of justice.  A genuine ius gentium [international law] is urgently necessary, without hegemonic dominion and its accompanying interventions:  only in this way can it be evident that it is a matter of protecting the rights common to all, even those who find themselves, so to speak, on the opposite side."

Cf. An unprincipled pacifism. 

"Visit this place, O Lord"

St. Gallen, Stiftsbibliothek 391, 11.

Visit this place, O Lord, and drive far from it all snares of the enemy; let your holy angels dwell with us to preserve us in peace; and let your blessing be upon us always; through Jesus Christ our Lord.  Amen.

     Compline/Daily devotions at the close of day, 1979 Book of common prayer.

Lord, we beg you to visit this house and banish from it all the deadly power of the enemy.  May your holy angels dwell here to keep us in peace, and may your blessing be upon us always.  We ask this through Christ our Lord.

     Night prayer after Evening prayer on Sundays and solemnities, Liturgy of the hours.

Visita, quaesumus, Domine, habitationem istam et omnes insidias inimici ab ea longe repelle; angeli tui sancti habitent in ea, qui nos in pace custodiant, et benedíctio tua sit super nos semper. Per Christum.

     Completorium, Post II vesperas dominicae et solemnitatum, Liturgia horarum.

     This is not, of course, present in either Bruylants or Corpus orationum, nor have I yet tried to push it back behind the "980+" given in CANTUS (e.g. St. Gallen, Stiftsbibliothek 391, 11 (above, initial 4 ("V")), where it is associated with the dedication of a church), though Rubén M. Leikem, cited below, finds it "outside of the Divine Office" in the context of an "Order for the visitation of the sick" as no. 1029 of the mid 9th-century sacramentary of Monza (in Monza, Kapitelsbibliothek cod. F1/101), albeit, according to the 1957 critical edition ed. Dold and Gamber, as a later interpolation ("The following [three prayers] stands (in place of a prayer 'In hospitale'?) on a many-lined erasure in a clumsy later script with many errors:") (258n42).  (Not that, given the interpolation, it matters, but the sacramentary of Monza is said to belong to the second group of "Gelasians of the 8th-century" that includes St. Gall (above?), Triplex, Rheinau, Phillips, Angoulême, and Monza, and that derives from a systematic revision of the first, namely the Gelasian and Gregorian-Paduan (257n40).)
     Nikolaus Gihr (whose theological commentary may be worth a look) says of the date of composition only that "The wording shows clearly that this oration stems from a time when Compline was still prayed not in the church but in the cloister or the dormitory immediately before going to bed" (Prim und Komplet des römischen Breviers, liturgisch und aszetisch erklärt (Freiburg im Breisgau:  Herder, 1907), 333).

     This, I'm assuming, is nothing more than a translation:

Ἐπισκέψαι ἱκετεύομεν κύριε τήνδε οἴκησὶν, καὶ πάσας τὰς τοῦ ἐχθροῦ ἐνέδρας αὐτῆς ἄπωσον·  οἱ ἄγγελοί σου οἰκῶσιν ἐν αὐτῇ ἐν εἰρήνῃ φυλάττοντες ἡμᾶς.  Καὶ ἡ εὐλογία σου ἀεὶ ἐφ' ἡμᾶς εἴη.  Διὰ Χριστοῦ.

Bibliography (as noticed only; I have not conducted a proper search):

• Leikam, Rubén M. "La oración Visita, quaesumus, Domine, habitationem istam." Ecclesia orans 19, no. 2 (2002): 247–64.  I have not yet completely mastered this one, which provides, on p. 260, a critical edition limited to the 8th/9th-century-and-following (mostly following) sources covered by the article.
• Alonso García, Ireneo. "Edicion Tridentina del Manual Toledano y su incorporacion al Ritual Romano." Salmanticensis 6, no. 2 (1959): 323–99.  Gives, on p. 58, an example of the incorporation of this prayer into a 16th-century "Exorcism of a house vexed by a demon [(Exorcismus domus a demonio vexatae)]".  Apparently the exorcism that includes this prayer was present in the Rituale Romanum current in 1959 (on which, see also Leikam, 258 ff.).  Whether it remains in De exorcismis et supplicationibus quibusdam (1999) I don't know.
• Gihr, Nikolaus.  Prim und Komplet des römischen Breviers, liturgisch und aszetisch erklärt.  Freiburg im Breisgau:  Herder, 1907.