Egbert van Heemskerck II |
[William
Mucklow], The spirit of the hat: or, the government of the Quakers among themselves,
as it hath been exercised of late years by George Fox, and other leading men,
in their Monday, or Second-dayes Meeting at Devonshire-house,
brought to light (London: F. Smith,
1673), 12.
The objection is to the departure
from the radical individualism of early
Quakerism, i.e. the reversion to a principle other than that of "the
true Light, which lighteth every man [(i.e. individual)] that comes into the
World" (20). And so it is to a kind of
hypocrisy: "How do they build up that
which they once pulled down; and do that themselves which they have condemned
in others?" "some of you [Quakers] were
Judged, Condemned, and Executed, for no other Cause than the Hat [(i.e. the insistence upon the right to leave it on before men of rank)],
and now they [(i.e. Fox and others)] Judge, Condemn, and Excommunicate [us]
for the same [(i.e. the insistence upon the right to leave it on before God in
prayer)], . . . Not that I am against this practice when required of the Lord,
but against the [merely] customary use thereof" (32), as imposed, "against . . .
my Conscience" (16), by "the Body the Touchstone" (18) rather than solely the
Light within. "as others before them set
up the Scriptures above the Spirit, in having that to be the Tryal,
Touch-stone, Standard of Doctrine Worship, and of all Spirits; so do they
greatly err in setting up the Body above the Spirit, in having the Spirit tried
by the Body; the one saieth, The Scripture is the Rule; but in truth,
their Meanings they make the Rule: The
other saieth, The Spirit (and not the Scripture) is the Rule; but
the Dictates of the Body they make the Rule.
For if I walk according to my Measure, and my Measure is my Rule, and it
differs from the judgment of the Body; by their Rule I am to deny my Motion,
because it answers not the mind of the Body; for they lay down this as an
infallible Rule, That the Body will have a true sense, feeling, and
understanding of Motions, Visions, Revelations Doctrines, &c. and
therefore safest to make Her my Touch-stone in all things relating to God" (21). And so "The same Arguments which
the Pope, &c. makes use of to support himself, the Body useth; and
severe judgment is denounced against him that shall speak a word against the
Authority of the Body, as it is against him that shall speak against the Power
and Authority of Rome" (22). "My
Friend observe; What difference is there in these things between George Fox
and the Papists? The one faith, No
Liberty out of the Church; the other, No Liberty out of the Power. Saith the Papist, What Liberty to the
Sectary? No, What Liberty to the
Heretick? No: And George Fox saith, What Liberty
to the Presbyter? No; What
Liberty to the Independent? No; What
Liberty to the Baptist? No: Liberty (saith he) is in the Truth" (12). "Many of the most eminent have had
potent Impulses, to give forth solid, and sound Arguments for Liberty of
Conscience [in this matter], and have pleaded strongly for the same, yet George
Fox was heard to say in a selected great Assembly thus, Though many
Friends have writ for Liberty of Conscience, I never lik’d the word, it is not a
good word. No Liberty to the
Presbyterians, no Liberty to the Papists, no Liberty to the Independents, no
Liberty to the Baptists, &c.
Liberty is to be only in the Truth, and, saith he, no Liberty out of the
Power" (41).
No, "the Unity that the Lord
approves of, is for every one to act according to his measure and growth in the
Truth" (11).
"Thus, whilst the earliest Quakers characterized disobedience to the Light as the archetypal sin (and obedience as the sole path to salvation) their successors envisaged a similar obligation to the community itself. Again, this reinforced the notion that Quakers viewed the movement as a Church not only in a mystical sense (that is, as Christ’s body) but an institutional sense, and, therefore, that the emerging organizational machinery of the movement had the authority to demand compliance" (Madeleine Pennington, Quakers, Christ, and the Enlightenment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021), 34, italics mine).
No comments:
Post a Comment