"Tradition and Scripture alone contain [(Mais cela n'empêche
pas la Tradition et l'Écriture de contenir seules)] the revelation and
constitute the theological loci that are fundamental. The Church has no other role than to
determine with an infallible authority what is contained in Tradition and
Scripture. Logically speaking, the
Church comes after Tradition and Scripture [and is subordinate to these]. If, then, one begins by treating [(l'on fait
débuter)] the theological loci with a consideration of the theological loci of
the Church, this could be based on a decision of a practical order that is
pedagogically useful but in no way necessary [(ce n'est là qu'un ordre pratique,
commode, nullement necessaire)]. But
what one cannot do without acting against the proper character of the
theological principles of faith as such [(sans aller contre genie proper du
Traité des Lieux théologiques)] is to attempt to found their authority
upon the authority of the Magisterium of the Church in so far as this
authority results from rational proofs of rational apologetics [(des
preuves rationnelles de l’Apologétique) such as historical-critical reasons
in favor of the faith]. This is to
interpret reductively [(rabaisser)] the theological loci which are the
foundation of theology and must be the starting points in faith from the
beginning [(qui, étant le fondement de la Théologie, doivent débuter d'emblée
en pleine foi)]. Between these starting
points [(eux)] and the goal pursued in a rational apologetical argument on
behalf of the faith [(et la fin du traité apologétique de l’Église)], there is
a gulf that can only be crossed by the total and definitive adhesion to the
Catholic faith [(il y a eu l’adhésion de la foi catholique totale et définitive)],
and with this the apologetical arguments are finished. There is a discontinuity between the science
of rational defense of the credibility of faith and the science of theology
[(entre l’Apologétique et la Théologie)].
In the interval between the two is a psychological act of faith, free
and supernatural. . . . It is the faith
and not the conclusions of apologetics that stands at the origins of theology 'quae
procedit ex principiis fidei.'"
Ambroise
Gardeil, O.P., La crédibilité et l'apologétique (Paris: J. Gabalda et Fils, 1912), 221-222, as
trans. Thomas Joseph White, O.P., at The incarnate Lord: a Thomistic study in Christology
(Washington, DC: The Catholic University
of America Press, 2015), 56n47. White
cites the printing of 1928.
No comments:
Post a Comment