National Endowment for the Humanities |
"The statement 'The unexamined life is not worth living' (the Socratic model, if you will) is very different from 'it has been shown to you, o man, what the Lord doth require of you.' . . . [F]rom a biblical point of view the answer to the question of what is the human good is not an object of one of the human sciences, to be found by our own lights. In fact the bible in part begins by holding up a mirror in which we see the insufficiency of our intellect and the muteness of that upon which we exercise our mind (mainly the natural world and the world of our experience) for giving the proper instruction with respect to the human good. For years and years and years, I read that passage in Aristotle and used to say, 'of course, it’s an object of inquiry,' but the way of the bible does not say that how to live your life is an object of inquiry. . . . [T]here is something radically different between a view of life in which nothing is immune to critical examination and a view of life that makes demands in both truth and practice, which you don’t regard as the fruits of an inquiry." Leon Kass, "Athens, Jerusalem, and modern science: an interview with Leon Kass, Amy Apfel Kass, and Francis Oakley," The cresset: a review of literature, the arts, and public affairs 72, no. 1 (Michaelmas 2008): 27-33. Headline from, of course, Tertullian, Prescription against heretics 7.
No comments:
Post a Comment