"[Albert] Outler[, who invented the so-called 'Wesleyan Quadrilateral,'] was a brilliant historian but a dilettante
in philosophy. Despite his vast
learning, he had no real need for issues in theory of knowledge, and this shows
up dramatically in the original version of the thesis. Hence he completely missed the extent to
which Wesley was a medieval figure in his treatment of Scripture. For Wesley, Scripture mattered because it
mediated divine revelation; and, like Aquinas, he was more than ready to come
to the aid of revelation with sundry appeals to the tradition of the church,
philosophical arguments of one sort or another, and experience—religious and
otherwise. This, of course, looks like
the Quadrilateral; but the resemblance is entirely superficial. Outler misread both the content—involving as
it does an appeal to revelation—and the structure—involving as it does a keen
sense of the utter sufficiency of revelation on its own."
William J. Abraham, "What Should United Methodists do with
the Quadrilateral?," Quarterly review 22, no. 1 (Spring 2002): 86 (85–88).
No comments:
Post a Comment