
"To those who know a little of Christian history probably the
most moving of all the reflections it brings is not the thought of the great
events and the well–remembered saints, but of those innumerable millions of
entirely obscure faithful men and women, every one with his or her own
individual hopes and fears and joys and sorrows and loves—and sins and
temptations and prayers—once every whit as vivid and alive as mine are now.
They have left no slightest trace in this world, not even a name, but have passed
to God utterly forgotten by men. Yet each of them once believed and prayed as I
believe and pray, and found it hard and grew slack and sinned and repented and
fell again. Each of them worshipped at the eucharist, and found their thoughts
wandering and tried again, and felt heavy and unresponsive and yet knew—just as
really and pathetically as I do these things. There is a little ill–spelled
ill–carved rustic epitaph of the fourth century from Asia Minor:—'Here sleeps
the blessed Chione, who has found Jerusalem for she prayed much'. Not another
word is known of Chione, some peasant woman who lived in that vanished world of
Christian Anatolia. But how lovely if all that should survive after sixteen
centuries were that one had prayed much, so that the neighbours who saw all
one's life were sure one must have found Jerusalem! What did the Sunday eucharist
in her village church every week for a life–time mean to the blessed Chione—and
to the millions like her then, and every year since? The sheer stupendous quantity of the love of God which this
ever repeated action has drawn from the obscure Christian multitudes through
the centuries is in itself an overwhelming thought. (All that going with one to
the altar every morning!)
"It is because it became embedded deep down in the life of
the christian peoples, colouring all the via
vitae of the ordinary man and woman, marking its personal turning-points,
marriage, sickness, death and the rest, running through it year by year with
the feasts and fasts and the rhythm of the Sundays, that the eucharistic action
became inextricably woven into the public history of the Western world. The
thought of it is inseparable from its great turning-points also. Pope Leo doing
this in the morning before he went out to daunt Attila, on the day that saw the
continuity of Europe saved; and another Leo doing this three and a half
centuries later when he crowned Charlemagne Roman Emperor, on the day that saw
that continuity fulfilled. Or again, Alfred wandering defeated by the Danes
staying his soul on this, while mediaeval England struggled to be born; and
Charles I also, on that morning of his execution when mediaeval England came to
its final end. Such things strike the mind with their suggestions of a certain
timelessness about the eucharistic action and an independence of its setting,
in keeping with the stability in an ever–changing world of the forms of the
liturgy themselves. At Constantinople they 'do this' yet with the identical
words and gestures that they used while the silver trumpets of the Basileus
still called across the Bosphorus, in what seems to us now the strange
fairy-tale land of the Byzantine empire. In this twentieth century Charles de
Foucauld in his hermitage in the Sahara 'did this' with the same rite as
Cuthbert twelve centuries before in his hermitage on Lindisfarne in the
Northern seas. This very morning I did this with a set of texts which has not
changed by more than a few syllables since Augustine used those very words at
Canterbury on the third Sunday of Easter in the summer after he landed. Yet 'this' can still take hold of a man’s life and work with it.
"It is not strange that the eucharist should have this power
of laying hold of human life, of grasping it not only in the abstract but in
the particular concrete realities of it, of reaching to anything in it, great
impersonal things that rock whole nations and little tender human things of one
man’s or one woman’s living and dying—laying hold of them and translating them
into something beyond time. This was its
new meaning from the beginning. The
Epistle to the Hebrews pictures our Lord as saing from the moment of his birth
at Bethlehem, 'Other sacrifice and offering Thou wouldest not, but a Body hast
Thou prepared for me; Lo I come to do Thy will, O God'. On the last night of His life it was still
the same: 'This is My Body'—'And now I
come to Thee'. It was the whole perfect
human life that had gone before and all His living of it that was taken and
spoken and deliberately broken and given in the institution of the eucharist."
Gregory Dix, The shape of the liturgy (Westminster: Dacre Press, 1945), 743-746.
this way of doing the eucharist alone fulfils every need of every church in every age. . . .
The outlines of that ritual pattern come down to us unchanged in christian practice from before the crucifixion. . . . The needs of a christian public worship have added to these inheritances from our Lord's own jewish piety only an 'introduction' of praise and a brief prayer of thanksgiving [(743)].
No comments:
Post a Comment