Saturday, May 21, 2011
"He moves through the world leaving people more alive to the things he loves."
Edmund de Waal, of Proust's Swann and by implication his own fourth cousin Charles Ephrussi, in The hare with the amber eyes: a family's century of art and loss (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2010), 106.
"you cause sufferings upon sufferings, in a miserable, lamentable welter of catastrophe."
The Chorus in Euripides' Helen, ll. 1163-1164, trans. James Morwood (Medea, Hippolytus, Electra, Helen, trans. & ed. James Morwood, Oxford world's classics (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 152). The Greek is more concrete:
ἐπὶ δὲ πάθεα πάθεσι φέρεις
ἀθλίοις ἐν σψμφοραῖς ᾿Ιλίοις.
ἐπὶ δὲ πάθεα πάθεσι φέρεις
ἀθλίοις ἐν σψμφοραῖς ᾿Ιλίοις.
Euripides on the point of punctuation
What is god, or is not god, or what is in between?
Which of mortals can say after searching?
He who can see the divine
leaping this way and that and back again
in contradictory unexpected shifts of fortune,
he it is who has got furthest towards an answer. . . .
. . . I can find no certainty among men,
no true report, about the gods above.
The Chorus in Euripides' Helen, ll. 1137-1150, trans. James Morwood (Medea, Hippolytus, Electra, Helen, trans. & ed. James Morwood, Oxford world's classics (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 152).
Which of mortals can say after searching?
He who can see the divine
leaping this way and that and back again
in contradictory unexpected shifts of fortune,
he it is who has got furthest towards an answer. . . .
. . . I can find no certainty among men,
no true report, about the gods above.
The Chorus in Euripides' Helen, ll. 1137-1150, trans. James Morwood (Medea, Hippolytus, Electra, Helen, trans. & ed. James Morwood, Oxford world's classics (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 152).
Carey on the pursuit of prosperity
"It is strange, in New York and Philadelphia, to see the feverish enthusiasm which accompanies Americans' pursuit of prosperity and the way they are ceaselessly tormented by the vague fear that they have failed to choose the shortest route to achieve it."
Olivier, in Peter Carey, Parrot and Olivier in America (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010), 237.
Olivier, in Peter Carey, Parrot and Olivier in America (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010), 237.
Saturday, May 14, 2011
"of whom the world was not worthy"

"The prayers of St Isaac the Syrian" (=chap. 5 of the long lost Second Part of the Writings) no. 26, trans. Sebastian Brock, Sobornost 16, no. 1 (1994): 28-29 (20-31).
Friday, May 6, 2011
Rogers on analogy and the queen of the sciences

"For Aquinas, all kinds of knowledge—especially Aristotelian scientia—depend on sources of light, on smaller revelations. First principles are manifestations of forms in the world, joining in one that which idiom divides, namely the form that inheres indifferently in minds and things. Each Aristotelian science is thus originated and individuated by its formal rationale or light. If you understand frogs, then you get light from frogs that gives rise to frog science in human minds. If you understand frogs, that also shows that frogs manifest frog-light, the first principles of frog, that give rise also to followable frog-structure in frogs themselves. That is also science, the science in frogs. The science in frogs gives light, and the science of frogs appears in the light. The more you attend to the first principles of frogs, the better science you have. The more you attend to frog-light, the more scientific your discipline is. The more something is revealed, therefore, the more scientific it is. Theology is no exception to that rule. Theology exemplifies that rule. Theology is for that reason not science by disciplinary extension; theology is science par excellence."
Eugene F. Rogers, Jr., "Thomas Aquinas on knowing and coming to know: the beatific vision and learning from contingency," in Creation and the God of Abraham, ed. David B. Burrell, Carlo Cogliati, Janet M. Soskice, and William R. Stoeger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 248-249 (238-258). For Rogers' comments on the true "distinction between the science that is sacred doctrine [(which, 'at least in this life, . . . is a science without scientists' (255))] and the sciences that are natural," see pp. 254 ff. (1) "Knowing," or Aristotelian epagoge (insight), is characteristic of "only God and the blessed in heaven" (238 ff., 256; "Aquinas recognizes that there is something so teleological about epagoge that it is not quite human" (241), and "troubles and disrupts Aristotle's commitments to teleology at several turns" (240)). Here below we have only (2) "coming to know," or the gradual but systematic exploitation of the contingency unattended to by Aristotle. "Retroduction, or contriving experiment, is [Thomistic] ethics applied to matter: it tests the character of things" (244). Etc. Aquinas as a thoroughly modern scientist. Brilliant. A tour de force. Worthy of a third or fourth read.
McMullin on the laws of nature
"Laws are the explananda; they are the questions, not the answers."
Ernan McMullin, The inference that makes science, The Aquinas Lecture, 1992 (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1992), 90.
Ernan McMullin, The inference that makes science, The Aquinas Lecture, 1992 (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1992), 90.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)